Comet C/2021 A1 Leonard

Image Info:
Object: Comet C/2021 A1 Leonard
DATE-OBS: 2021-11-24T23:59:46.308
EXPTIME(Seconds): 1800
SUBFRMS: 30
OBJCTRA: 12 44 54.89
OBJCTDEC: +32 16 14.5
Binning: 2 X 2
Plate Scale: 1.77″ /Pixel
Orientation: North Down/ East Left
Catalogs & Filter Magnitude Results:
Astrometry Catalog:UCAC4
Photometry Catalog:UCAC4
Imaging Filter: Astrodon Ex-BB
Photometry Mag: +8.64 V-band
Instruments:
CCD: KAF-8300 (5.4µm x 5.4µm)
TELESCOPE: C08, 1260.0mm
PRiSMv10, Tycho8.4
Site:
ORIGIN: Cepheid Observatory, India
SITELAT: +24:55:00:00
SITELONG:+75:33:58:99
Observers:
Cepheid Observatory
Vorion Scientific Observatory
Remark:
Sky Clear/Low Altitude

ExoClock project II: A large-scale integrated study with 180 updated exoplanet ephemerides

The ExoClock project is an inclusive, integrated, and interactive platform that was developed to monitor the ephemerides of the Ariel targets to increase the mission efficiency. The project makes the best use of all available resources, i.e., observations from ground telescopes, mid-time values from the literature and finally, observations from space instruments. Currently, the ExoClock network includes 280 participants with telescopes capable of observing 85\% of the currently known Ariel candidate targets. This work includes the results of ∼1600 observations obtained up to the 31st of December 2020 from the ExoClock network. These data in combination with ∼2350 mid-time values collected from the literature are used to update the ephemerides of 180 planets. The analysis shows that 40\% of the updated ephemerides will have an impact on future scheduling as either they have a significantly improved precision, or they have revealed biases in the old ephemerides. With the new observations, the observing coverage and rate for half of the planets in the sample has been doubled or more. Finally, from a population perspective, we identify that the differences in the 2028 predictions between the old and the new ephemerides have an STD that is double what is expected from gaussian uncertainties. These findings have implications for planning future observations, where we will need to account for drifts potentially greater than the prediction uncertainties. The updated ephemerides are open and accessible to the wider exoplanet community both from our Open Science Framework (OSF) repository and our website.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.13863

Photometry: HAT-P-19b

Exo-Planet, Class confirmed:
HAT-P-19b
Imaged/Calibration/Image solve:
PRiSM v10
Photometry and Data Fitting:
HOPS 3.0.4/Platform: Python 3.7.6
Instrument:
CCD: ATIK-383L+ mono
FILTERS: R
TELESCOPE: C8, 1263.0mm
Site:
ORIGIN: Cepheid Observatory, India, Vorion Scientific, India
SITELAT: +24:55:00:00
SITELONG:+75:33:58:99
Observers:
V.K.A, B.K., S. M., K.V.
Remark:
Sky Clear
End

Comet 29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann

Image:
Object: 29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann
DATE-OBS: 2021-11-01.94717
EXPTIME(Seconds): B/V/4680R/I/g’2/r’2/i’2/z’2/Exbb
SUBFRMS: B/V/52R/I/g’2/r’2/i’2/z’2/Exbb
OBJCTRA: 04 51 39.23
OBJCTDEC: +32 16 12.30
Catalogs/Filter Magnitude Results:
Astrometry Catalog: ATLAS: N, UCAC4: Y, GAIAEDR3: N
Photometry Catalog: : UCAC4: Y, APASS: N, ATLAS: N
Johnson/Bessel: (B): +., (V): +12.7, (R): +., (I): +.
Sloan: g’2: +., r’2: +., i’2: +., z’2: +.
Clear: CL: +.
Filters:
Sloan: u’2: N, g’2: N, r’2: N, i’2: N, z’2: N
Johnson/Bessel: U: N, B: N, V: N, R: Y, I: N
Clear/Other Filters: Clear: N, Ex-bb: N
Instruments:
Mount: SW EQ8-R
Switch: Pegasus UPB-2.0
Focuser: Pegasus UPB
CCD: ATIK-383L+mono/Atik-EFW (9 positions)
TELESCOPE: C08, 1260.0mm
PRiSMv10, Tycho8.4
Site:
ORIGIN: Cepheid Observatory, India
SITELAT: +24:55:00:00
SITELONG:+75:33:58:99
Observers:
K.V
Measures:
S.M, B.K, V.A.
Remark:
Sky Clear
End

C/2021A1 Leonard

Image:
Object: C/2021A Leonard
DATE-OBS: 2021-11-01.00211
EXPTIME(Seconds): B/V/600R/I/g’2/r’2/i’2/z’2/Exbb
SUBFRMS: B/V/10R/I/g’2/r’2/i’2/z’2/Exbb
OBJCTRA: 11 51 07.64
OBJCTDEC: +32 52 40.0
Catalogs/Filter Magnitude Results:
Astrometry Catalog: ATLAS: N, UCAC4: Y, GAIAEDR3: N
Photometry Catalog: : UCAC4: Y, APASS: N, ATLAS: N
Johnson/Bessel: (B): +., (V): +12.1, (R): +., (I): +.
Sloan: g’2: +., r’2: +., i’2: +., z’2: +.
Clear: CL: +.
Filters:
Sloan: u’2: N, g’2: N, r’2: N, i’2: N, z’2: N
Johnson/Bessel: U: N, B: N, V: N, R: Y, I: N
Clear/Other Filters: Clear: N, Ex-bb: N
Instruments:
Mount: SW EQ8-R
Switch: Pegasus UPB-2.0
Focuser: Pegasus UPB
CCD: ATIK-383L+mono/Atik-EFW (9 positions)
TELESCOPE: C08, 1260.0mm
PRiSMv10, Tycho8.4
Site:
ORIGIN: Cepheid Observatory, India
SITELAT: +24:55:00:00
SITELONG:+75:33:58:99
Observers:
K.V
Measures:
S.M, B.K, V.A.
Remark:
Sky Clear/Low Altitude
End

SN2021wuf/NGC6500

Image:
Object: SN2021wuf/NGC6500
DATE-OBS: 2021-10-31.57239
EXPTIME(Seconds): B/V/1800R/I/g’2/r’2/i’2/z’2/Exbb
SUBFRMS: B/V/30R/I/g’2/r’2/i’2/z’2/Exbb
OBJCTRA: 17 56 02.52
OBJCTDEC: +18 21 14.1
Catalogs/Filter Magnitude Results:
Astrometry Catalog: ATLAS: N, UCAC4: Y, GAIAEDR3: N
Photometry Catalog: : UCAC4: Y, APASS: N, ATLAS: N
Johnson/Bessel: (B): +., (V): +14.3, (R): +., (I): +.
Sloan: g’2: +., r’2: +., i’2: +., z’2: +.
Clear: CL: +.
Filters:
Sloan: u’2: N, g’2: N, r’2: N, i’2: N, z’2: N
Johnson/Bessel: U: N, B: N, V: N, R: Y, I: N
Clear/Other Filters: Clear: N, Ex-bb: N
Instruments:
Mount: SW EQ8-R
Switch: Pegasus UPB-2.0
Focuser: Pegasus UPB
CCD: ATIK-383L+mono/Atik-EFW (9 positions)
TELESCOPE: C08, 1260.0mm
PRiSMv10, Tycho8.4
Site:
ORIGIN: Cepheid Observatory, India
SITELAT: +24:55:00:00
SITELONG:+75:33:58:99
Observers:
K.V
Measures:
S.M, B.K, V.A.
Remark:
Sky Clear
End

Comet: C/2019 L3 ATLAS

Image:
Object: C/2019 L3 ATLAS
DATE-OBS: 2021-10-13T22:30:03.0
EXPTIME(Seconds): B/V/43200R/I/g’2/r’2/i’2/z’2/Exbb
SUBFRMS: B/V/90R/I/g’2/r’2/i’2/z’2/Exbb
OBJCTRA: 07 39 30.24
OBJCTDEC: +42 02 44.4
Catalogs/Filter Magnitude Results:
Astrometry Catalog: ATLAS: N, UCAC4: Y, GAIAEDR3: N
Photometry Catalog: : UCAC4: Y, APASS: N, ATLAS: N
Johnson/Bessel: (B): +., (V): +11.5, (R): +., (I): +.
Sloan: g’2: +., r’2: +., i’2: +., z’2: +.
Clear: CL: +.
Filters:
Sloan: u’2: N, g’2: N, r’2: N, i’2: N, z’2: N
Johnson/Bessel: U: N, B: N, V: N, R: Y, I: N
Clear/Other Filters: Clear: N, Ex-bb: N
Instruments:
Mount: SW EQ8-R
Switch: Pegasus UPB-2.0
Focuser: Pegasus UPB
CCD: ATIK-383L+mono/Atik-EFW (9 positions)
TELESCOPE: C08, 1260.0mm
PRiSMv10, Tycho8.4
Site:
ORIGIN: Cepheid Observatory, India
SITELAT: +24:55:00:00
SITELONG:+75:33:58:99
Observers:
K.V
Measures:
S.M, B.K, V.A.
Remark:
Sky Clear
End

Comet: 4P/Faye

Image:
Object: 4P/Faye
DATE-OBS: 2021-10-10T22:36:31.5
EXPTIME(Seconds): B/V/2700R/I/g’2/r’2/i’2/z’2/Exbb
SUBFRMS: B/V/30R/I/g’2/r’2/i’2/z’2/Exbb
OBJCTRA: 06 20 40.183
OBJCTDEC: +14 50 33.58
Catalogs/Filter Magnitude Results:
Astrometry Catalog: ATLAS: N, UCAC4: Y, GAIAEDR3: N
Photometry Catalog: : UCAC4: Y, APASS: N, ATLAS: N
Johnson/Bessel: (B): +., (V): +12.8, (R): +., (I): +.
Sloan: g’2: +., r’2: +., i’2: +., z’2: +.
Clear: CL: +.
Filters:
Sloan: u’2: N, g’2: N, r’2: N, i’2: N, z’2: N
Johnson/Bessel: U: N, B: N, V: N, R: Y, I: N
Clear/Other Filters: Clear: N, Ex-bb: N
Instruments:
Mount: SW EQ8-R
Switch: Pegasus UPB-2.0
Focuser: Pegasus UPB
CCD: ATIK-383L+mono/Atik-EFW (9 positions)
TELESCOPE: C08, 1260.0mm
PRiSMv10, Tycho8.4
Site:
ORIGIN: Cepheid Observatory, India
SITELAT: +24:55:00:00
SITELONG:+75:33:58:99
Observers:
K.V
Measures:
S.M, B.K, V.A.
Remark:
Sky Clear
End

R Band

Comet: 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko

Image:
Object: 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko
DATE-OBS: 2021-10-09T22:34:06.32
EXPTIME(Seconds): B/V/810R/I/g’2/r’2/i’2/z’2/Exbb
SUBFRMS: B/V/9R/I/g’2/r’2/i’2/z’2/Exbb
OBJCTRA: 05 39 22.395
OBJCTDEC: +23 27 15.63
Catalogs/Filter Magnitude Results:
Astrometry Catalog: ATLAS: N, UCAC4: Y, GAIAEDR3: N
Photometry Catalog: : UCAC4: Y, APASS: N, ATLAS: N
Johnson/Bessel: (B): +., (V): +11.1, (R): +., (I): +.
Sloan: g’2: +., r’2: +., i’2: +., z’2: +.
Clear: CL: +.
Filters:
Sloan: u’2: N, g’2: N, r’2: N, i’2: N, z’2: N
Johnson/Bessel: U: N, B: N, V: N, R: Y, I: N
Clear/Other Filters: Clear: N, Ex-bb: N
Instruments:
Mount: SW EQ8-R
Switch: Pegasus UPB-2.0
Focuser: Pegasus UPB
CCD: ATIK-383L+mono/Atik-EFW (9 positions)
TELESCOPE: C08, 1260.0mm
PRiSMv10, Tycho8.4
Site:
ORIGIN: Cepheid Observatory, India
SITELAT: +24:55:00:00
SITELONG:+75:33:58:99
Observers:
K.V
Measures:
S.M, B.K, V.A.
Remark:
Sky Clear
End

Emulating Our Parent Star: Solar eruptions and their Geo-effectiveness

Dr. Shirsh Lata Soni worked in solar and space physics, APS University, MP, India. Here in this blog, she explains and light on the solar explosion and their geo-effectiveness.

She says:

We have been taught from childhood that the Sun is our parent star and it is a fireball with millions of Kelvin temperature. The Sun loses about 4 million tons of mass in the form of energy during nuclear fusion and about 1.5 million tons of mass each second, in the form of solar wind and other eruptions. However, the Sun has lost less than 0.1 percent of its mass since it was formed, 4.5 billion years ago.

The Sun emits energy in a huge range of electromagnetic waves: from X-rays (solar flares) to radio waves (solar radio bursts). Thus, it is difficult to study the energy emitted from the sun in any one fixed band. Most extensively explosive phenomena on Sun are known as Coronal Mass Ejection (CME). One of the most important reasons to study CMEs is that they are amongst the major drivers of what is known as space weather – a series of phenomena, disturbances, and technical failures that are caused by solar events Figure 1.


Figure 1. Examples of ways in which space weather can affect Earth and its infrastructure. Image courtesy: Space Weather Forecast Centre, Japan

CMEs are huge and spectacular clouds of magnetic field and plasma that regularly erupt from the Sun and propagate throughout the interplanetary medium. Forecasting CMEs and their impact on Earth, however, is not as straightforward as it may seem. Firstly, as each CME is characterised by its own latitudinal and longitudinal extent, it is important to determine whether a CME will impact Earth at all (which is known as the hit/miss problem). Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that appear to surround the occulting disk of the observing coronagraphs in skyplane projection are known as halo CMEs (Howard et al., 1982). Halo CMEs are fast and wide on the average and are associated with flares of greater X-ray importance because only energetic CMEs expand rapidly to appear above the occulting disk early in the event. Halos with their sources within ±45◦ of the central meridian are known as disk halos, while those with a central meridian distance (CMD) beyond ±45◦ but not beyond ±90◦ are known as limb halos, See Figure 2 and Figure 3.

Figure 2: These solar disks show the selected active region passes through the central meridian of the heliographic disk. In the first column we shown solar disk in 94 Å band and in the second column in the figure we choose the continuum image of the solar disk (a) Shows the first Active period with the three most active region AR 11875, AR 11877, and AR 11882 dated 23/10/2013, 24/10/2013, and 30/10/2013 respectively. (b) Shows the first Active period with the three most active region AR 11884, AR 11890 dated 02/11/2013, and 04/11/2013 respectively. (c) Shows the first Active period with three most active region AR 12192, AR 12201, and AR 12205 dated 23/10/2014, 04/11/2014, and 10/11/2014 respectively.
Figure 3: GOES X-ray plots in two wavelength bands (red) 1-8 A and (green) 0.5-4 A for duration 22-29 Oct 2013 (a), period 01-08 Nov 2013 (b), and third period 25Oct-08Nov 2014 (c). The circle indicates the X-class flares.

Disk halos are likely to arrive at Earth and cause geomagnetic storms, while limb halos only impact Earth with their flanks and hence are less geoeffective. Secondly, every CME has its own initial speed that will change by the time it reaches Earth because of interactions with the local solar wind speed (which is known as the arrival time problem). In the interplanetary medium, the CME went through acceleration and deceleration due to solar wind speed and finally come to speed nearly equal to speed of solar wind. But as we know that the speed of solar wind shows variation during the 11 year period of solar cycle. Finally, the direction of the magnetic fields within a CME plays an important role in driving space weather effects at Earth – the most geoeffective structures are those that are pointing southward of the ecliptic plane, because they interact the most with Earth’s intrinsic magnetic field, opening it to dangerous particles and radiation. This problem is known as the BZ problem (where Z indicates the north–south component).

The problems related to space weather forecasting of CMEs are not over yet! When CMEs are detected in situ, they are often accompanied by so-called interplanetary shocks ahead of them. The region of shocked and compressed solar wind that lies between a shock and an ICME ejecta (flux-rope or not) is known as the sheath region. Sheath regions can be powerful drivers of geomagnetic storms themselves, but they are (if possible) even more challenging to forecast than CMEs, especially because of their turbulent and variable nature.

A large part of my PhD studies has been centred on determining the features of early evolution of CMEs from its eruption site on solar atmosphere (active regions). Thesis includes comprehensive investigations of propagation characteristics of coronal mass ejections (CMEs)  in the solar corona and interplanetary medium along with explorations of solar source regions of CMEs and flares with their interplanetary consequences and geo effectiveness. For this purpose, I carried out an analysis of multiwavelength, multi-instrument, multi-point observations of solar activity as well as interplanetary observations with the help of data obtained from space and Earth-based instruments as well. It is clear that many questions are still open in CME research and forecasting, but I am positive that the next few years will be filled with exciting new discoveries (especially with the recently launched NASA’s Parker Solar Probe spacecraft and the future  ISRO’s Aditya L1 and ESA’s Solar Orbiter mission). Below you can find my doctoral dissertation and its included publications:

Find more about her work at:

https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/303830

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shirsh-Soni

Dr. Shirsh Lata Soni

Dr. Shirsh Lata Soni, Research Scholar (Astronomy and Solar terrestrial Physics) SAS-10 CSSTEAP (UN Course / ISRO) A.P.S. University Rewa, MP, India